Category: Skeptics Circle
-
Skeptics’ Circle Number 85
Andrea’s Buzzing about the latest skeptic’s circle. I’d point out in particular Blake Stacey’s discussion of the real expelled, scientists who challenge creationism. And I’d also recommend the Pap smear to Skepchic. It makes sense in context.
-
Skeptics’ Circle #84—read it today!
The new Skeptics’ Circle is up at Archeoporn. Never miss an episode!
-
More flu woo from Mercola
OK, I never really liked Joe Mercola, but when I read about this story on his website, I was encouraged. Boy, do I feel like a sucker. He started out so well, telling us about the tragic case of a child who died of influenza this year, and how health officials rapidly responded by increasing…
-
A leap year Skeptics’ Circle
At Conspiracy Factory. In particular I like Skepchik’s take on a pretty horrifically sexist Oprah poll which seems to present the only options for women in a stressful situation are to cry now or cry later or act like a big strong man. Hmm. PalMD has really been fighting the good fight lately with this…
-
Skeptics’ Circle Number 77 – White Coat Underground
White Coat Underground has the overmedicalized edition. I’m pleased to see Happy Jihad House of Pancakes arguing for more skepticism in the humanities as part of the circle. And a great post on epidemiology and autism from Andrea. Orac had some important things to say about consensus, and just to clarify my position on how…
-
Skeptics’ Circle Number 76
Good for Martin Hosting the Skeptics’ Circle and keeping out the cranks. I’m fond of Whiskey Before Breakfasts’ entry on just whether the 20th century truly was the bloodiest, and Knudsens News straight-faced description of the failure of doctors to meet chiropractic standard of care. Enjoy!
-
74th Skeptics’ Circle – Med Journal Watch
Med Journal Watch has it up. I must admit some sadness that yet again one of my skeptic colleagues has fallen for Sandy Szwarc’s nonsense though. People, figure this out, she’s not a real skeptic. They don’t make blanket statements like this: Hearing that a study found some food, exposure or physical characteristic is associated…
-
Skeptics’ Circle Number 73 – Holford watch
Holford Watch has a form letter for us to fill out for this week’s version of the circle. My favorite from this week is Action Skeptic’s essay, which I think describes a character flaw common among cranks. That is, it’s not so important for them to operate with scientifically valid rules of evidence or inquiry,…
-
72nd Skeptics’ Circle
Le Canard Noir scolds me at the Quackometer for the 72nd installation of the skeptic’s circle. Check it out!